|
<Past |
Future> |
| 11.0 |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required (POA&M Required) |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required (POA&M Required) |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
| 12.x |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required (POA&M Required) |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required (POA&M Required) |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
| 13.x |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required (POA&M Required) |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required (POA&M Required) |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
| 14.x |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required (POA&M Required) |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required (POA&M Required) |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
| 15.x |
Authorized w/ Constraints [9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16] |
Authorized w/ Constraints (DIVEST) [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Authorized w/ Constraints (DIVEST) [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Authorized w/ Constraints (DIVEST) [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required (Divest) [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required (Divest) [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[b] [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
Unauthorized, Conditions Required[a] |
| 16.x |
Authorized w/ Constraints (POA&M) |
Authorized w/ Constraints [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Authorized w/ Constraints [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Authorized w/ Constraints [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Authorized w/ Constraints [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Authorized w/ Constraints [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Authorized w/ Constraints [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Authorized w/ Constraints [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Authorized w/ Constraints [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Authorized w/ Constraints [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Authorized w/ Constraints [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
Authorized w/ Constraints [9, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17] |
| Note: |
At the time of writing, version 16.0.4.2161 is the most current version, released 04/09/2025. |
| | | | [9] | Users should check with their supervisor, Information System Security Officer (ISSO) or local OIT representative for permission to download and use this software. Downloaded software must always be scanned for viruses prior to installation to prevent adware or malware. Freeware may only be downloaded directly from the primary site that the creator of the software has advertised for public download and user or development community engagement. Users should note, any attempt by the installation process to install any additional, unrelated software is not authorized and the user should take the proper steps to decline those installations. | | | [10] | Due to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) identified security vulnerabilities, extra vigilance should be applied to ensure the versions remain properly patched to mitigate known and future vulnerabilities. The local ISSO (Information System Security Officer) can provide assistance in reviewing the NIST vulnerabilities. | | | [12] | If free trialware is utilized, the technology must be purchased or removed at the end of the trial period.
Per the Initial Product Review, users must abide by the following constraints:
- PL/SQL Developer will require a 3rd party FIPS 140-2 certified solution for any data containing PHI/PII or VA sensitive information.
- Users should ensure that the vendor’s website complies with all VA security standards before entering any PII/PHI.
- System administrators must ensure that the latest stable version of PL/SQL Developer is used. Additionally, PL/SQL Developer must be added to the list of applications for continuous monitoring for published vulnerabilities, updates, and patches.
Users must ensure that Oracle Database is implemented with VA-authorized baselines. (refer to the ‘Category’ tab under ‘Runtime Dependencies’) | | | [14] | The Federal Information Processing standards (FIPS) 140-2 certification status of this technology was not able to be verified. This technology will require a 3rd party FIPS 140-2 or 140-3 certified solution for any data containing PHI/PII or VA sensitive information, where applicable. More information regarding the Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP) can be found on the NIST website. | | | [15] | Veterans Affairs (VA) users must ensure VA sensitive data is properly protected in compliance with all VA regulations. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed by the local ISSO (Information System Security Officer) to ensure compliance with both VA Handbook 6500 and VA Directive 6500. | | | [16] | Per the May 5th, 2015 memorandum from the VA Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) FIPS 140-2 FIPS 140-2 Validate Full Disk Encryption (FOE) for Data at Rest in Database Management Systems (DBMS) and in accordance with Federal requirements and VA policy, database management must use Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 140-2 or its successor to protect the confidentiality and integrity of VA information at rest at the application level. If FIPS 140-2 encryption at the application level is not technically possible, FIPS 140-2 or 140-3 compliant full disk encryption (FOE) must be implemented on the storage device where the DBMS resides. Appropriate access enforcement and physical security control must also be implemented. All instances of deployment using this technology should be reviewed to ensure compliance with VA Handbook 6500 and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. It is the responsibility of the system owner to work with the local CIO (or designee) and Information System Security Officer (ISSO) to ensure that a compliant DBMS technology is selected and that if needed, mitigating controls are in place and documented in a System Security Plan (SSP). By September 22, 2026, all FIPS 140-2 certificate validations will be placed on the Historical List, please refer to FIPS Transition Effort for further guidance and timeline of changes. | | | [17] | Users must ensure that Oracle Database is implemented with VA-authorized baselines. (refer to the ‘Category’ tab under ‘Runtime Dependencies’)
If free trialware is utilized, the technology must be purchased or removed at the end of the trial period.
Per the Initial Product Review, users must abide by the following constraints:
- PL/SQL Developer will require a 3rd party FIPS 140-2 certified solution for any data containing PHI/PII or VA sensitive information.
- Ensure that the TRM authorized version of PL/SQL Developer is used. Additionally, the product must be added to the list of applications for continuous monitoring for published vulnerabilities, updates, and patches. ISSO’s and administrators must monitor the National Vulnerability Database for any new security vulnerabilities.
- OMB Memorandum M-22-18,” Enhancing the Security of the Software Supply Chain through Secure Software Development Practices,” and OMB Memorandum M-23-16, “Update to Memorandum M-22-18,” limit agencies’ ability to use software that is not developed using secure practices. The attestation form will allow software producers to confirm that they follow those practices.
VA Supply Chain Risk Management (SR) Policy and VA Handbook 6500.6, Contract Security, Appendix C states that the contractor (including producers and resellers) shall comply with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) M-22-18 and M-23-16 when using third-party software on VA information systems or otherwise affecting the VA information. This includes new software purchases and software renewals for software developed or modified by major version change after the issuance date of M-22-18 (September 14, 2022).
|
|